How to 'connect' micro-regions with macro-regions? A Note (9 pages)

Document rating:
  3.7 out of 5
Vote this doc:
background image

E -

34

According to Durán et al (2009), in this evolution towards more international

actorness, three ‘waves’ can be distinguished. In a first wave, starting in the 1980s, certain

micro-regions started to get involved in the promotion of foreign direct investment (FDI)

and tourism, and the affirmation of their culture and identity.

A second wave started in the 1990s when certain micro-regions were provided with

certain legally or constitutionally grounded diplomatic instruments. In some cases, micro-

regions started to build a foreign-policy apparatus (i.e. an administration), mainly consisting

of horizontal coordination between the different functional departments. The authors

currently see a third wave, which is characterized by a verticalization of the organizational

structure

VII

, a strategic re-orientation of the geo-political and/or functional priorities (e.g.

more emphasis on multilateralism and inter-regionalism), the integration of external

instruments of sub-state foreign policy into a well-performing whole, and the enmeshment

of diplomacy and para-diplomacy.

For the purpose of our short article, it is important to highlight the similarity

and/or convergence between both phenomena. Not only can one find coinciding

objectives (commercial interest, political objectives, affirmation of identity), but macro-

regions and micro-regions are also faced with common issues and obstacles when pursuing

these objectives. These issues include their unclear diplomatic status and the issue of

representation in multilateral scenarios. Macro-regions and micro-regions can thus be seen

as similar emerging international actors.

4. Cross-border micro-regions and macro-regions as related

phenomena

Besides their possible definitional connection (see point two), and their coinciding

extra-regional and international actorness (point three), I distinguish a third way to connect

micro –and macro-regions. I focus thereby on a sub-set of micro-regions, namely the

hybrid cross-border micro-regions. I am referring to cases such as the Euro-regions in the

European Union (EU), the US-Mexican border, the growth triangles in Southeast Asia, the

Development Corridors in Southern Africa, the zonas fronterizas in the Andean region, etc.

It can be shown, both empirically and theoretically, that the development of both types of

regions is not necessarily disconnected.

Document rating:
  3.7 out of 5
Vote this doc: